<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">Baba Banda Singh Bahadur's resistance against the Mughal Empire in the early 18th century was characterized by a unique form of grassroots governance and representation. While not conforming to modern democratic ideals, Banda Singh's rule exhibited elements of participatory decision-making. His code of conduct for Sikhs outlined principles of justice and equality, emphasizing ethical governance.</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">Banda Singh implemented land reforms that aimed at addressing social inequalities by redistributing land among peasants. This measure not only contributed to economic justice but also represented a form of grassroots representation, empowering local communities. The establishment of Sikh administrative structures under Banda Singh provided a platform for the promotion of Sikh values, creating a system where the principles of justice and equality were foundational.</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">While Banda Singh's governance was ultimately suppressed, his brief rule showcased a model of leadership that sought to involve local communities in decision-making processes. The participatory elements of his rule, although contextualized within the historical period, reflected a commitment to principles that resonated with democratic ideals.</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">Both Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Baba Banda Singh Bahadur, in their respective times, exhibited governance structures that incorporated elements of representation. Ranjit Singh's centralized rule included regional representation through the appointment of Misldars, fostering a balance between central control and local autonomy. Banda Singh's resistance, on the other hand, showcased grassroots governance with participatory elements, reflecting a commitment to justice and equality. While not conforming to modern democratic norms, these historical examples provide insights into the evolving forms of governance and representation within the Sikh historical context.</p>