<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">Baba Banda Singh Bahadur's regime in the early 18th century was marked by a different form of conflict resolution, rooted in the context of resistance against the Mughal Empire. Banda Singh Bahadur led a rebellion against the oppressive regime, seeking to address historical grievances and establish a just socio-political order. His approach to conflict resolution involved both military resistance and negotiations. Banda Singh Bahadur, upon capturing Sirhind, issued a proclamation that ensured safety to civilians and respected the religious places of the town, showcasing a commitment to humane conflict resolution even in the midst of war.</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">However, the ultimate suppression of Banda Singh Bahadur's rebellion by the Mughal forces limited the long-term impact of his conflict resolution efforts. The resistance he led laid the groundwork for subsequent uprisings and the eventual establishment of the Sikh Empire under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. While Banda Singh Bahadur's efforts were not entirely successful in his time, his vision for a just society and his attempts at resolving conflicts through negotiations left a significant mark on the historical narrative of resistance against oppression.</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="margin: 0in; font-family: Söhne; font-size: 12.0pt; color: #374151;">Maharaja Ranjit Singh's rule was characterized by a diplomatic and pragmatic approach to conflict resolution, exemplified by treaties and inclusive governance. In contrast, Baba Banda Singh Bahadur's time, marked by resistance against the Mughal Empire, showcased attempts at humane conflict resolution within the context of war. Both leaders, in their respective eras, grappled with the complexities of conflict and sought resolutions that aligned with their visions for governance and justice.</p>